Essayquality唯一网址：https://www.essayquality.com/留学生代写平台，是一家专业高品质的论文代写机构，业务包括：美国论文代写、本科论文代写、留学ps代写、数学essay代写、math论文代写、math优质论文范文、留学assignment代写、留学论文代写、新西兰代写、文科论文代写、考试代考、网课代修、网课代上、考试代考、北美代写等。100%准时交付，接受12小时急单。
我们不盲目以低价来吸引客户，我们只以优质的服务和认真负责的态度来赢得客户的信赖和支持。100%原创，均经过turnitin检测，绝无作弊。14天免费修改，不满意全额退款。现在下单，立即搞定论文！
Japanese Automobile manufacturers achieved a competitive position that was not easily imitable and then maintained the competitive positioning in international markets. To understand the making of this competitive standpoint, it is necessary to understand the chronology of its making. Japanese firms have been applauded for their manufacturing efficiency from as early as the 1980s. The physical productivity of Toyota was seen to set the standards for most international plants and operations (Cusumano, 1998). High productivity was achieved by means of process efficiency and rapid inventory turnover. In addition to the good practices that were observed by the company, the innovations in production management were one of the main reasons that Japanese automobile manufacturing was able to move ahead competitively (Herrons & Hicks, 2008). Innovations are usually original practices or the improvements that are made on some original practices.In the case of the production styles of Japan, one of the initial criticisms were that Japanese copied automobile manufacturing from the techniques of the United States.
However, this was not true. When the US manufacturing entities suffered from productivity and performance issues the Japanese firms that were established in Tennessee, Ohio and California were seen to have higher quality and productivity than any other. Neither did the Japanese automakers copy the works of European production and management. In house experimentation in the 1930s and the 1950s of Nissan and Mitsubishi was seen to help bring this competitive advantage. To a certain extent the Nissan and Mitsubishi models were built on conventional ones. However, post war producers such as Toyota was seen to avoid copying the techniques that many others of the international market relied on. Tailoring an efficient production system that will suit their beliefs seemed to be core to Toyota’s innovation management (Cusumano, 2013).
日本轿车制造商获得了不易模仿的比赛位置，并在国际市场上保持了比赛位置。为了了解这种比赛态度的构成，有必要了解其构成的时刻顺序。早在20世纪80年代，日本企业就因其出产功率而备受赞誉。丰田的实践出产力被认为是大多数国际工厂和运营的标准(Cusumano,1998)。出产功率高，库存周转快。除了公司所遵照的杰出实践之外，出产办理上的立异也是日本轿车制造业可以在比赛中抢先的主要原因之一(Herrons&Hicks,2008)。立异通常是原始的实践，或者是对一些原始实践的改善。就日本的出产方式而言，开始的批评之一是日本抄袭美国的轿车制造技术。
但是，实际并非如此。当美国制造业实体遭遇出产率和绩效问题时，在田纳西州、俄亥俄州和加利福尼亚州成立的日本企业被视为质量和出产率最高的企业。日本轿车制造商也没有抄袭欧洲的出产和办理模式。在20世纪30年代和50年代的室内试验中，日产和三菱被认为有助于带来这种比赛优势。日产和三菱的车型在一定程度上是建立在传统车型的基础上的。但是，人们认为，战后的丰田(Toyota)等制造商防止拷贝国际市场上许多其它制造商所依托的技术。为他们的崇奉量身定做一个高效的出产系统似乎是丰田立异办理的中心(Cusumano,2013)。
Essayquality北美Top20商学院导师一对一服务，成绩80%以下全额退款。免费提交作业要求，满意后付款，安全省心无顾虑。专业硕博写手团队，所有订单可靠准时，保证100%原创。如果您有意向，赶紧联系我们的客服或者添加微信：EG1hao，我们有专业水平的导师为您提供服务，让论文写作不再犯难。
